Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Unlike Elon Musk’s “One Price” Approach: Anthropic (ANT.US) Roadshow Pricing Inquiry at $70-78, Institutional Investors Become the True Decision Makers in IPO Pricing

Unlike Elon Musk’s “One Price” Approach: Anthropic (ANT.US) Roadshow Pricing Inquiry at $70-78, Institutional Investors Become the True Decision Makers in IPO Pricing

智通财经智通财经2026/11/14 00:01
Show original
By:智通财经

Anthropic will launch what is set to be the largest IPO in history next week, aiming to take this title from SpaceX. However, unlike Elon Musk’s conglomerate, large investors will have greater influence over its IPO pricing amid the ongoing turbulence in the artificial intelligence (AI) market.

According to Zhitong Finance APP, Anthropic PBC (ANT.US) is set to launch what may become the largest IPO in history next week, aiming to overtake SpaceX (SPCX.US) for the title. However, unlike Elon Musk’s conglomerate, major investors will have greater influence over its IPO pricing amid the current turbulence in the artificial intelligence (AI) market landscape.

This Claude developer is gauging investor interest in its IPO shares at a price range of $70 to $78 per share, in contrast to SpaceX’s approach—which locked in a fixed price of $135 per share during roadshows, leaving the market with a simple “take it or leave it” choice.

Although Anthropic is determined to claim the largest IPO title, some market observers warn that it should avoid overly aggressive pricing, ensuring institutional investors find the valuation reasonable and leaving room for gains on the first trading day.

Pitchbook Senior Late-Stage Analyst Harrison Rolfes commented: “Anthropic is using a more conventional roadshow model. Relying on institutional subscription demand to determine the IPO price can reduce the probability of the stock breaking below its issue price post-listing.”

However, this does not guarantee there will be no post-IPO decline. The current market environment is full of uncertainties, compounded by management changes at Nvidia (NVDA.US), making Anthropic’s closing stage of the IPO process far more challenging than SpaceX’s $86.2 billion listing in June this year.

In the quarter when SpaceX went public, the Nasdaq 100 index surged almost 28%, providing strong support; currently, the stock is up 3% from its IPO price. Over the past three months, however, amid US interest rate hikes, widespread concerns over an oversupply of AI-related debt, and data centers supporting large models like ChatGPT and Claude facing voter opposition during midterm elections, the Nasdaq 100 index has dropped about 7%. Previous market rumors that Anthropic’s valuation could reach $2 trillion have also faded away.

“It’s clear they are in tune with market sentiment,” said Andy Tang, a partner at Draper Associates and former tech investment banker. “They are proceeding with the IPO at a more conservative level.”

Anthropic is currently targeting a fully diluted valuation of around $1.4 trillion. This IPO aims to raise up to $64.4 billion, combined with a $26 billion private placement, bringing the total fundraising above that of SpaceX.

IPO Boutique partner and senior research analyst Jeff Zell also stated, “IPO window timing likely played a crucial role in Anthropic lowering its valuation and scaling back its fundraising target.”

Private Placement

Private placements are another major difference between the two companies’ listing plans. SpaceX’s IPO did not secure specific cornerstone investors, while Anthropic has already arranged a $26 billion private placement led by Alphabet (GOOGL.US) and Nvidia, with a total of seven tech companies participating.

Columbia University adjunct professor and former Barclays Global Head of Equity Capital Markets David Erickson believes that, amid market volatility, such a sizable placement signals to the market strong support from external industry capital. Moreover, this private transaction incurs no underwriting fees, which only apply to the public offering portion.

Erickson added that investors involved in the placement must wait until the shares are registered before selling; besides, these companies are part of Anthropic’s computing power supply chain and have motivation for long-term holdings.

There’s also another key difference between the two companies: experience in dealing with public capital markets. For over a decade, Musk has been raising funds for Tesla through investment banks and is well-versed in Wall Street rules; in contrast, Anthropic, founded less than five years ago, is a newcomer to the capital markets.

“Obviously, Elon Musk has a wealth of experience dealing with Wall Street, so he can dictate the transaction terms. Anthropic, having no such prior experience, is likely following the banks’ guidance,” said Erickson.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Both are Tech Giant IPOs, Why is Anthropic's Listing Valuation More Conservative Than SpaceX?

Unlike SpaceX's fixed pricing model, Anthropic adopts the traditional roadshow approach, granting more pricing power to institutional investors. Due to factors such as the Nasdaq downturn, Federal Reserve rate hikes, and AI oversupply, the market environment is under pressure, and previous expectations for a $2 trillion valuation have faded. Analysts point out that the difference in pricing strategies between the two companies essentially reflects the depth of their relationships with the Wall Street capital markets.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/13 23:51
Both are Tech Giant IPOs, Why is Anthropic's Listing Valuation More Conservative Than SpaceX?

Inflation Pressures Persist, Fed Rate Hike Expectations Intensify, AI Investment Risks Increase Financial Stability Concerns

As U.S. inflation accelerates again, Federal Reserve officials have intensively released hawkish signals this week, further strengthening market expectations for a rate hike in December and opening the door to another rate hike in January next year.

智通财经•2026/11/13 23:47
Inflation Pressures Persist, Fed Rate Hike Expectations Intensify, AI Investment Risks Increase Financial Stability Concerns

Barclays Turns Tactically Bullish on US Stocks for the First Time Since March, Recent Selloff Sets Stage for Short-Term Rebound

As investors significantly reduce their stock holdings and market volatility pressures ease, Barclays' trading division has turned tactically bullish on US equities for the first time since mid-March this year.

智通财经•2026/11/13 23:47
Barclays Turns Tactically Bullish on US Stocks for the First Time Since March, Recent Selloff Sets Stage for Short-Term Rebound

Goldman Sachs 2027 Macro Outlook: Global Economy to Accelerate Slightly, but the Path Remains Rocky and Downside Risks Cannot Be Ignored

Goldman Sachs expects global GDP growth to rise from 2.7% in 2026 to 2.8% in 2027, with energy price shocks shifting from a headwind to a tailwind, and AI investment remaining the main growth driver. The three major downside risks stem from energy impacts related to the Iran situation, the bond market, and the AI cycle. Annual inflation is expected to decline, though upside risks persist. The Federal Reserve is projected to raise rates once each in December and March 2027, while the European Central Bank is expected to begin rate cuts in December 2027 and Q4, respectively. Both equities and bonds are expected to generate positive returns in 2027, though volatility risks are increasing, and returns on commodities are expected to be close to zero.

华尔街见闻•2026/11/13 22:11
Goldman Sachs 2027 Macro Outlook: Global Economy to Accelerate Slightly, but the Path Remains Rocky and Downside Risks Cannot Be Ignored